12/31/1955 · DEED · book 35 page 225 doc 4811@35/225

225 DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE THE WASHINGTON TRUST COMPANY, of Westerly, Rhode Island, having received full payment and satisfaction of the within mortgage, recorded in the Land Evidence Records in the Town of Charlestown in Real Estate Mortgage Book Number 35 Page 223-225 did hereby cancel and discharge the same. IN TESTIMONY WOf SEAL, said Company has caused the present to be signed and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed by Raymond M. Holberton its Treasurer duly authorized, this 3rd day of May, A. D. 1962. THE WASHINGTON TRUST COMPANY By Raymond M. Holberton Treasurer Signed and sealed in presence of Virginia M. Algiers Recorded December 30, 1962 by p. 225 L.E.R. and recorded by Town Clerk ---- KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, CHARLES J. LINK and DOROTHY T. LINK, husband and wife, both of the Town of Charlestown, County of Washington, State of Rhode Island, for consideration paid, grant to THEODORE W. MOLLER and ROSE J. MOLLER, husband and wife, both of said Town, County and State, as Joint Tenants and not as Tenants in Common, with WARRANTY COVENANTS that certain tract or parcel of land, together with the buildings and improvements thereon, situated in the Town of Charlestown, County of Washington, State of Rhode Island, and bounded and described as following: Beginning at a point marking the northeasterly corner of the premises herein conveyed; said point being Two Hundred Seventy Seven (277) feet southerly from the boundary of the highway known as "Old Post Road", commonly known as the "Post Road", southerly boundary, and Twenty-five (25) feet westerly from the westerly boundary line of premises of Charles W. Link et al; thence running south 41 degrees 15 minutes east, maintaining a distance of Twenty-five (25) feet and then running south 41 degrees 15 minutes east and parallel to said westerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the southerly boundary line of Charles W. Link et al, a distance of Two Hundred Ten (210) feet to the